The Bar Council 2018 Law Reform Essay Competition: Not a Silver Bullet but a Bullet Nonetheless London Barristers Chambers

The rule whereby life imprisonment is a period of eight, nine, ten or eleven years has no statutory authority. It is an administrative practice only, and, no doubt, the administrative practice will be adapted to the new circumstances if this Bill goes upon the Statute Book.

  • It is difficult to find one’s bearings, to retain a sober, accurate judgment, and to know where one stands.
  • Friend the Member for South Ayrshire (Mr. Emrys Hughes) emerging suddenly from the Lobby and saying, “I went into the wrong Lobby and I found there that old right hon. Gentleman the Member for Woodford”—but he called him by a rather more colourful term.
  • At present if a young girl is caught by some lustful scoundrel in the dark and raped, after the act the man might think that if he killed his victim—the only person who could recognise him—that would mean the rope rather than imprisonment.
  • Since 1976, when the death penalty was reinstated in the United States, there have been 807 executions.

This punishment violates that very basic right of people. It also undermines human dignity and is considered extremely degrading. After submitting this paper, I was over the moon to hear that I’d been accepted to do a foundation year at the university, I really was. A foundation year is something you complete when your grades don’t meet the requirements of your desired course, it provides you with core knowledge on a few subjects relevant to the course you want to study. I was keen to get through it and prove that I could study law, so I powered through the year and passed it with flying colours.

Frequently Asked Questions about Ethical Arguments in Essays

In conclusion, the arguments put forward by people who support or are against the death penalty often reflect their deeper principles and beliefs. These beliefs and principles are deeply rooted in life experiences and the way people are brought up and are unlikely to be swayed by clever arguments. It is interesting that in this country most people are in favour of the death penalty yet parliament continues to oppose it. In this case it could be argued that parliament is leading the way in upholding human rights and continues to broadcast the clear message that killing is always wrong. Supporters of capital punishment also tend to use the argument of deterrence.

The principal one that I see is that it does serve to reinforce and to emphasise again an aspect of this matter which I am sure we all welcome. That aspect is that it has always been treated in this House as strictly a non-party question. I have already said, and repeat it now, that it is open to anyone to change his mind. Anyone who voted against the Motion last time and votes with us today we would welcome, and anyone who decided to vote the other way I would not criticise. Member on the principle, if he will forgive me saying so, I would regard as redundant. Next, review the balance of your argument and ensure that you have considered arguments for both sides of the debate. Include any examples of real-world information that you can use to support your arguments, and then assess your overall plan thinking about what conclusions you can draw from your arguments.

See Also  Protecting children from domestic abuse


In the context of post-conflict societies, however, exemption from criminal liability, even for the commission of serious crimes, should be allowed. In this context, there is often a perceived trade-off between justice and peace.

Incidentally, nobody would ever guess from what has been said by the abolitionists in this debate that anybody had ever reintroduced capital punishment anywhere. Finally, in Nebraska, another adjoining State, there had always been capital punishment. In a way I am glad to take part in the debate, although it is the sort of debate in which it is most difficult to speak because, however we may contain ourselves, in such a debate as this emotion must play a part on both sides. I do not think that it is a bad thing that that should be so. It is curious that, following that, he claimed in his book that what finally decided him beyond all else was the number of people who were applying for the post of hangman from week to week. That was sentiment—though I am not saying it was false—rather than logic, without any doubt. I want to go very much further than my right hon. and gallant Friend the Home Secretary in changing the law of murder; I want to see not only the implementation of the three recommendations which he made in his speech when we debated the Motion.

LNAT Essay: Section B of the LNAT

We must also consider what may happen when a murderer is sent to prison, if the Bill is passed. Members on both sides of the House who have had the experience of talking either to prison officers or to those who have had contact with these hardened criminals, will know that one of the things which they try to do is to keep up their reputation for toughness. The situation may arise in which a prisoner who has been convicted of murder and has been reprieved and sent to one of Her Majesty’s prisons murders another prisoner or a warder. Under the Bill he would be able to do so without receiving the slightest additional penalty. First, while I should be in favour of some amendment of the law of murder, for reasons which I shall state later, I believe that capital punishment ought to be retained, particularly as a unique deterrent to professional criminals. Secondly, the Bill makes no attempt to deal with the problems arising from abolition, and the hon.

  • The jury convicted because those men were proved to be liars.
  • While some people argue that it is a necessary punishment for the most serious crimes, others believe that it is inhumane and should be abolished.
  • One man—a man whom Liverpool will never forget—settled the difficulty.
  • So far as one could have uniformity or integrity of social background, we have it in that one area.

When selecting a topic for your essay where you want to include an ethical argument, make sure you can frame the argument in a way where you argue whether the idea or proposal is morally right or wrong. Writers encounter challenges when making ethical arguments for diverse audiences.

Do executions put people off murder?

Of people stopped between 30 and 60, but cessation of a criminal career was just as likely to happen after a three months’ sentence as it was after one of five years. Here again, it is impossible to trace the effect of severe punishments on the conduct of the habitual criminal. Let us consider another attempt by this country to reduce crime by savagery. In 1878, the Prisons Act was passed and the whole of our prisons were taken over by the Home Office and out of the hands of the local justices. With the unification of the prison system there was introduced what was known as the Ducane system, after Sir Edmund Ducane, the first Chairman of the Prison Commissioners. I am making a general case that the effect of abolition in foreign countries has never led to an increase in murders.

  • Member for Bridgeton (Mr. Carmichael), who is opposed to the views I hold, and I on this side of the House have sought to catch the eye of the occupant of the Chair since the beginning of the debate.
  • Some use a lethal injection, which does not affect every individual the same way, while in less developed countries, the hangman’s noose is used to perform an execution.
  • The effectiveness of the death penalty had been questioned by many justice and law enforcement agencies.
  • Perhaps nothing was more significant to him than the fact that five people a week, on the average,

    apply for the job of public hangman in this country.

  • When questioned afterwards by the psychiatrist, he said, “Well, you know, I felt I wanted to be somebody. I wanted to be in the limelight.”

I find myself this afternoon in a unique position, because I think that it is a fact that most hon. Members opposite are in agreement with what I have to say, whereas a great many on this side of the House are not necessarily in agreement with me.

Argumentative Criminal Justice and Death Penalty Essay Topics

Those are the subtle pressures which I think all of us exert upon ourselves. Far

from being improper pressures, I think they are the kind of pressures which ordinary civilised behaviour ought to impose upon every one of us, but I hope that tonight those pressures, whether internal or external, will be resisted by hon. Members, because there are far more important issues to be determined. Friends and I tabled an Amendment which would have had the effect of restoring what I think I can, without offending against the rules of the House, call the Silverman Clause and we forced it to a Division. To our surprise, when the Division took place, we saw hon.

death penalty should be legal essay

I have given a very few arguments and I have perhaps spoken long enough for a maiden speaker. I wish to thank the House for the indulgence which has been shown to me, and I hope that what I have said has not caused any offence to any hon. I have no hesitation in saying that I support the Bill and shall continue to support it during the rest of the stages of its passage through this House. Some people will say, “Thou shalt not kill” in any circumstances. I cannot agree with it, but that is the sort of assumption which some people will make, Others will make the assumption that hanging is too good for some types of person. On the whole, if one is to make an assumption, one must make an assumption which adequately reflects the social conscience of our community—not a statement of morality, and heaven forbid that it should be a statement of theology. Today the State has under its control appalling weapons of mass destruction.

Model Essay

Of the murderers, one or two are not detected at all. Some are declared insane, either certified as unfit to plead or found guilty but insane, and some commit suicide, when arrested or when under suspicion, in circumstances pointing to mental abnormality, and perhaps four of the twelve are reprieved. I say at once that I do not share those criticisms. I could see many good reasons, and some practical convenience, if the Government had, in fact, decided to introduce a Measure of their own. Equally well I can see some positive advantages in doing it in the way the Government have chosen.

  • I shall try to deal with two or three of the arguments which have been put, and must obviously be put, to any Home Secretary.
  • To write an argumentative criminal justice essay, choose a debatable topic, gather relevant evidence, develop a clear thesis statement, structure your essay with an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion, and use persuasive language to support your claims.
  • The LNAT essay section is a 40-minute task that requires you to write a maximum 750-word essay on one of three given essay prompts.
  • This article provides 97 free law essay topics for you to consider.

So, despite my earlier hang-ups about my academic ability, I will be leaving the University of Cumbria with a first-class degree, and as the winner of the Sweet & Maxwell Law Prize. I also received subject excellence and contribution to law awards along the way. Work-wise, I have finished my long stint in restaurant and bar work and I now work at Butterworths Solicitors as a Legal Adviser handling civil litigation claims.

Argumentative Criminal Justice Essay Topics about Jail and Prisons

But it so happens that Norway, Denmark, Queensland and New Zealand had the same tradition as we have. The police in those countries were unarmed when capital punishment was abolished in those countries, and in none of them was it found necessary to arm the police. They issued automatics to the police when the police were going after men who were armed and were likely to use arms.

His most recent novel is called A Lesson Before Dying (New York 1994). It tells the story of an African-American condemned man in Louisiana waiting to be executed. His attorney had tried to save him by saying to the white jury, ‘Why, I would just as soon put a hog in the electric chair as this,’ a beastly designation that the despairing condemned man, Jefferson, accepts. Set during an earlier generation when Gruesome Gertie, the name of the electric chair, was trucked around the state to the local court-houses, it proves that the dramaturgy of execution was intended to shame the community and to terrorize children. Led by Miss Emma (‘I don’t want them to kill no hog’) and Tante Lou who goad the local schoolteacher to prison visits, the community suffers through the subsequent drama of waiting by bringing sustenance to Jefferson and by recollecting him to himself. The condemned and the community restore their dignity, the latter by stopping work on the day of electrocution and the former by walking upright himself to the chair.

The British lawyer fighting to ban the death penalty

As the House will be aware, in case after case a brutal murderer has done his utmost, by pleading insanity, to go to Broadmoor rather than to the scaffold. If ever there was a cold-blooded murderer, who death penalty should be legal essay had murdered six times for gain, that was Haigh; but only after Haigh was captured were these

strange bloodthirsty stories produced plus a tame psychiatrist, Dr. Yellowes, to say that Haigh was mad.

See Also  Protecting children from domestic abuse